Its not faster or more stable then the other two. Btrfs lacks maturity and stability at the time of this writing but is more feature-rich compared to EXT4. Here are some more benchmarks. 2 kernel. 其實你提到一個重點了. The benchmark results of three most common file systems under Linux environment were given in this paper. Btrfs uses Copy-on-Write (COW), a resource management technique where a. As far as I know, the 4k block size is important for such webgui, it makes it faster to open sites (for ex. If you omit the size parameter, a journal size based on the size of the file system is used. 10. Hi I never worry about it… my latest SSD SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB has a 10 (limited) year 50GB a day warranty, Have OCZ’s with thousands of hours running btrfs all running fine. - Nén dữ liệu ở mức độ cao. Es un sistema de archivos actualizado y también fiable. Recommended for general use. The benchmark I linked attributes this to copy-on-write behaviour of btrfs. 1 interface. A：BTRFS系能最差，不到20 seeks/sec. removes the need for LVM and thus eliminates 1 layer for filesystem-ing (if that’s a word) On top of that, in 2008, the principal developer of EXT3 and. BTRFS have some fancy features, and could help. ran btrfs balance to balance all btrfs volumes. But, as always, your specific use case affects this greatly, and there are corner cases where any of. It is an extent-based filesystem that is used to describe long,. OpenSUSE hiện sử dụng btrfs làm tùy chọn mặc định cho phân vùng /root, nơi đặt hệ điều hành. Maybe. g. A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. 6：顺序. The Ext4 file system is mainly used on Linux, while the NTFS file system is commonly used on Windows, and the HFS+ file system is suitable for macOS. XFS vs. Btrfs vs Ext4. EXT4 is very low-hassle, normal journaled filesystem. which btw you should put in here then as well. The thing is I'm putting /home in a separate HDD. But. For example, in the case of Btrfs, SATA SSDs are showing around a 10%. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. Hope that answers your question. ago. However, I was using the openSUSE's default partition layout, which is btrfs for / and xfs for /home. Here are the major feature of BTFS over ext4. We also provide useful. If you're looking to warehouse big blobs of data or lots of archive and reporting; then by all means ZFS is a great choice. Thanks. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99. So if you are after the most speed for the buck and if your NAS is already doing RAID 5 or more, you could go for Ext4. XFS does not require extensive reading. Though personally I'd still go with ext4 primarily because despite recognizing some potential benefits of btrfs, I really don't see them as important for how I use my computers. I have fsck enabled via fstab and it checked the fs at boot (Last checked: Thu Nov 4 07:58:57 2021) which maybe took 5 - 10 minutes, did not stop exact time though. 另外，我们常说的file对象，它用于关联进程和dentry对象的. But timeshift reports (maybe due to different sizes of the combined btrfs) as reported in my initial. A daily snapshot of Ubuntu 19. This is the first time that the new EXT4 and Btrfs and NILFS2 filesystems have been directly compared when it comes to their disk performance though the results may surprise. You didn't provide the Linux distribution information, but assuming CentOS or Red Hat, XFS is now somewhat integrated. The Backend/Frontend separation is clean and shardmap is clever. 15 or newer (Please the same OS using same activating services and same apps!)The snapshots do not take up any space. I've set up and used btrfs for years and later zfs for the past few years both professionally and on home servers. 8 snapshot as of last week. With Bcachefs on its trek towards the mainline Linux kernel, this week I conducted some benchmarks using the very latest Bcachefs file-system code and compared its performance to the mainline Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system competitors on both rotating and solid-state storage. See FUSE. . I know the latest versions do not setup /home in a separate partition anymore but as a btrfs subvolume instead. F2FS vs. To add a block device to a Btrfs volume, use the btrfs device add and btrfs filesystem balance commands. The check task is involves reading roughly 2000 small files in their entirety and performing some processor intensive tasks on them. 1. Both ext4 and XFS should be able to handle it. In this episode of the CyberGizmo I benchmark the 4 filesystems chosen by Phoronix for his testing and use my own workloads to compare and contrast them. WD & Windows vs. So I moved everything off of it and formatted it into XFS and ate the 0,5% space loss for peace of mind. The fastest for the SATA/USB tests was XFS followed quickly by EXT4 and then F2FS. ext4 is not recommended. Conclusion: Last time I ran these tests, xfs and ext4 pulled very similar results, and both were miles ahead of btrfs. ZFS likes eating RAM. Although Btrfs lacks stability and maturity as of this writing, it is more feature-rich than EXT4 despite this. XFS is optimized for large file transfers and parallel I/O operations, while ext4 is optimized for general-purpose use with a focus on security. Definitely ext4. Does that mean that if I'm using btrfs snapshots, it will not save parity data for any snapshots other than the current state of the drive, that it will only save parity data for one snapshot other than the current state of the drive, or that it will fail entirely?Generally, would go with btrfs. Although Btrfs still has a journal-like log tree, it is only used to speed-up fdatasync/fsync. For zfs there is a plugin. In fact, BTRFS is also a copy-on-write system to support fault tolerance and file recovery, and provides easy management. This is why XFS might be a great candidate for an SSD. Depends on the application. In a significant data corruption, Ext2 and Ext3 file systems are more possible and easy to recover data due to their data redundancy compared with Ext4. I don’t think any vendor will support ZFS unless Oracle fixes the license. The Btrfs filesystem supports read-only and writable snapshots of the file. All have pros and cons. mount the recently formatted btrfs partition without special options just with mount /dev/nvme0n1p2 /mnt and create the subvolumes you want, e. Ext4 is built on older technology, so it lacks modern file-system features found in systems like E2FS and BtrFS. The space savings with zstd compression are insane, and I see virtually no performance degradation. 3 XFS. My leading candidates are Ext3/4, XFS, Btrfs, and ZFS (feel free to argue for another). XFS doesn't have any RAID, while Btrfs RAID is not yet completely stable and is in its early days. Both Btrfs and ZFS offer built-in RAID support, but their implementations differ. Posts: 5,135. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. Probably those edge cases are not visible on an external USB hard drive, could be visible with external SSDs on a USB3. The logical path from Ext4 is to Btrfs. 4. XFS is better larger files and long-term maintaince and stability. I've also heard that LVM snapshots can. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. Main features: Data protection features, including snapshot, replication, and point-in-time recovery. Linux 5. ext4 or XFS are otherwise good options if you back up your config. The SATA 3. ext4,xfs,btrfs,zfsでベンチマークしてます。. I've also ran some experiments on some older machines with slow IDE drives, once while installing a distro with ext4, and once with btrfs+zstd as root. Watching LearnLinuxTV's Proxmox course, he mentions that ZFS offers more features and better performance as the host OS filesystem, but also uses a lot of RAM. El sistema de archivos es mayor de 2 TiB con inodos de 512 bytes. Snapraid says if the disk size is below 16TB there are no limitations, if above 16TB the parity drive has to be XFS because the parity is a single file and EXT4 has a file size limit of 16TB. Example 2: ZFS has licensing issues to Distribution-wide support is spotty. The 3 types of file systems support large file size and volume size. We believe that btrfs has the correct feature set and roadmap to serve Ceph in the long-term, but XFS and ext4. With the noatime option, the access timestamps on the filesystem are not updated. What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. Running AIO-Stress on the Western Digital VelociRaptor was yielding speeds not technically possible for the Serial ATA 3. This section highlights the differences when using or administering an XFS file system. BTRFS solves all the problems I had so far: supports online resizing - both extending and shrinking. Both. XFS and ext4 now calculate a checksum on metadata and their journal files. Ext4 tiene el registro en diario de forma predeterminada y es probable que los nuevos usuarios no sepan cómo deshabilitarlo para guardar lecturas / escrituras en sus. provides. Edit: I managed to save the two NTFS HDDs with chkdsk, but the exFAT drive just didn't wanna play ball. 8 snapshot as of last week. Even after then I was able to transfer data out of the filesystem. Btrfs Btrfs support has been included with the mainline 2. But still iffy on high raid levels. The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. Ext4 specially without a journal and XFS are both extremely fast. 对于一些文件系统如Ext4等，在硬盘格式化时就全部确定了，而对于XFS则是动态生成的，BtrfS则是更特别的动态实现。. Rationale is native Linux nature, vs xfs being Linux supported. Is XFS better than btrfs? September 30, 2023 by Garry. It is the default file system in RHEL 6, Debian 7, Ubuntu 18 and so on. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. Fuck writes blocking reads. Otherwise use BTRFS. Ext3, or Ext4) to the Btrfs file system using the btrfs-convert tool. openZFS would be another great option, except for licensing issues. 3. The host is proxmox 7. When use btrfs it's 35-40 MB/s. ext4 with m=0 ext4 with m=0 and T=largefile4 xfs with crc=0 mounted them with: defaults,noatime defaults,noatime,discard defaults,noatime results show really no difference between first two, while plotting 4 at a time: time is around 8-9 hours. Btrfs (pronounced as Butter FS, Better FS, or B-Tree FS) Considering that the btrfs will be able for spanning over the multiple hard drives, it is a very good poit that it can support 16 times more drive space than the ext4. my oldest one a OCZ Agility3 60GB is. And you might just as well use EXT4. If you don't need consistency supported by a filesystem, you can use ext4 with journal option off, F2FS (when a program that use /tmp. The EXT4 f ile system is 48-bit with a maximum file size of 1 exbibyte, depending on the host operating system. Red Hat Training. g. Reliable! I used it in Rsync mode as only my backup disk is btrfs, everything else was ext4 or XFS. Especially things that cause lots of file-internal fragementation like databases. EXT4 vs. Some think of the B-tree file system as a better, more modern alternative to ext4. I've seen benchmarks (eg: this one) that put btrfs considerably slower than ext4. The question is XFS vs EXT4. Ext4 seems better suited for lower-spec configurations although it will work just fine on faster ones as well, and performance-wise still better than btrfs in most cases. Mar 14, 2012. but for the shared servers with many users you might consider xfs for the parallel IO and number of files. Silent data corruption, sometimes referred to as bitrot, is more. The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. I'd like to take advantage of an OS switch to upgrade to BTRFS. both have hidden sharp edges, work differently, and have different design philosophies in terms of the command line tools etc. Page 2 of 2. Sun Microsystems originally created it as part of its Solaris operating system. The problem (which i understand is fairly common) is that performance of a single NVMe drive on zfs vs ext4 is atrocious. I have hard reset my machines running XFS and not once did I have any problems or need to give the partition the "spank of life" if you will. El tipo de archivo Ext4 admite tamaños de partición de hasta 1 EiB (Exibyte). Each one might work for you based on YOUR needs! Supp. No swap because 16GB RAM is enough for me. The only issue with it is that its built-in RAID 5/6 functionality is still not usable and can lead to data loss. Ext4 file systems. 1 million iops for ext4, right in line with the spec of the drive times 2,. XFS is a robust and mature 64-bit journaling file system that supports very large files and file systems on a single host. We see that on the SMR disk btrfs has most of the advantage on overall ops that it has on ext4, but penalty on random appends is not as dramatic as a ratio. Edit: I managed to save the two NTFS HDDs with chkdsk, but the exFAT drive just didn't wanna play ball. 2. Log in • Sign up. XFS vs Ext4. The 3TB HDD are ext4. This is useful, though far less complete than the block-by-block checksums of btrfs and ZFS. Otherwise it's sort of figuring out what features you want to drop. 6,861. Each file system has its own advantages and disadvantages. Utilice. Pros: Individual file size: 16GB to 2TB. a lot of btrfs' perception of 'breaking' is actually due to checksums (correctly) finding fault on a users data and (correctly) not allowing mounting of the filesystem until it's fixed. Higher scores are better. BTRFS vs EXT4 speed and compression. Ext4文件系统是Ext3的继承者，是Linux下的主流文件系统。经过多年的发展，它是目前最稳定的文件系统之一。但是，老实说，与其他Linux文件系统相比，它并不是最好的Linux文件系统。 在XFS vs Ext4方面，XFS在以下几个方面优于Ext4： After a week of testing Btrfs on my laptop, I can conclude that there is a noticeable performance penalty vs Ext4 or XFS. And I don't know if btrfs is right thing for my server. Data integrity protection. EXT4 is better in the general case. I've used EX4, XFS, EXT4+LVM and now I'm under BTRFS, and I can tell you, TF2, CSGO, Factorio, KSP, etc, all perform the same under all of them. Btrfs 與 EXT4 常見問題解答. Ext4 and XFS are both great for "I need a filesystem, to store files, on this drive". Btrfs removes duplicate data from disk directly while Ext4 cannot do that, ext4. So it has no barring. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. For example btrfs supports transparent file compression. Da Btrfs sehr leistungshungriger ist, benötigen NAS-Systeme dafür einen starken Prozessor und ausreichend Arbeitsspeicher. Linux 5. The ZFS file system combines a volume manager and file. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. - Bảo vệ dữ liệu. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. To be clear, I am using RAID0 with two SSDs with strip size of 256Kb. Multimedia Sanctuaries: With large files as daily bread, ext4 is indispensable. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. Linux EXT4/Btrfs RAID With Twenty SSDs Storage :. Now today I had a power outage on our office server and I discovered that one file on the JFS volume has been completely corrupted. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. So please enlighten me, where is btrfs better and where is it worse or just significantly different than ZFS. BTRFS's problems are exaggerated, and depending on your use case may fit better than ZFS. Language: Format: Language and Page Formatting Options. data, so it's possible to only keep the metadata with redundancy ("dup" is the default BTRFS behaviour on HDDs). I’d still choose ZFS. Btrfs supports RAID 0, 1, 10, 5, and 6, while ZFS supports various RAID-Z levels (RAID-Z, RAID-Z2, and RAID-Z3). And you might just as well use EXT4. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. LVM has snapshots. Next we will need to rebuild grub, first mount the EFI folder (in our case its /dev/sda1) mount -t auto /dev/sda1 /efi. A tool for managing BTRFS and LVM snapshots. Because of that, the Ext4 file system is very stable. The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome Find the best product instantly. Btrfs, EXT4, XFS, F2FS, and NILFS2 were tested on a Linux 5. I was using NTFS due to compatibility. g. EXT4 and XFS show similarities in some features. . Many options exist for file systems including Ext2/3/4, Btrfs, etc. In the past, I have often seen statements that EXT4 is better for gaming than XFS. However, Ext3 lacks advanced file system features like extent blocking mapping, dynamic allocation inode, and defragmentation. Depending on why you want btrfs, you could run zfs. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe. 再將資料再回存到 NAS, 這部份會花費很多時間. With ZFS ZVOLs, you can run other file systems like ext4 or xfs for special situations (like as storage for VMs) and still get snapshots/block checksumming. If you think that you need. Januar 2020. BTRFS also had somewhat higher latency than EXT4, meaning that it took longer for files to be accessed on the file system. For btrfs you have to do most from CLI. Comparison of file archivers. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. For example it's xfsdump/xfsrestore for xfs, dump/restore for ext2/3/4. - Tạo và lưu trữ snapshot. Otherwise btrfs for snapshots via snapper. Ability to shrink filesystem. Example: Dropbox is hard-coded to use ext4, so will refuse to work on ZFS and BTRFS. 15 Comparing KPTI/Retpoline. Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. ZFS ain't bad, but this whole btrfs data loss myth needs to stop. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. EXT4 Vs XFS. Also I've thought about btrfs again. That was many years ago, perhaps when btrfs was less ready. Both are good file systems. FreeBSD has ports you can install that will allow data transfer of some linux file systems. 0 File-System. Data Colossi & Data Centers: Ext4 is non-negotiable for handling extensive data transactions. I see that it says multiple btrfs snapshots are not supported. Hey Guys! Welcome to XPSTECH. 📽️ Abonnez-vous : Devenir membre VIP : et se former à #Linux, voici ce que je vous propose dans cet. But as some users found out, automatic snapshot (at the time it was first released) ate disk space on single user installations. Uma das decisões que você tem que tomar quando vai instalar qualquer distro Linux é o Sistema de arquivos do Linux! São vários para escolher, EXT4, XFS e BTR. Looking at benchmarks however it seems to have poor. It provides an unlimited subdirectory. There was some fun in getting it mounted, but this link set me straight finally! Other sites said to mkfs. creating volumes and mounting them would need to check that option and decide on appropriate mount points. I'll be going RAID 6. スナップショットの取得機能LVMで搭載されてた増分、差分のバックアップ機能ext3,ext4からbtrfsへの変換と逆変換機能SSDへの最適化RAID機能（今まではmd mdadmなどのデバイスマッパーでしか出来な. They both use delayed allocation to achieve file. Usable space isn't a big issue but I don't want to lose half with RAID 10. After much reading on ReFS, Btrfs, & ZFS, I've decided to run all 3 🤷♂️(Did the same with Seagate vs. For these reasons, Fedora has made BTRFS the standard filesystem in their newer releases. XFS vs. BTRFS subvolumes and the way a distro like Opensuse handles it, by using subvolumes and snapshotting on upgrades, is really nice. Considering that btrfs will be able to span over multiple hard drives, it's a good thing that it supports 16 times more drive space than ext4. I have a raid 1 setup on dual 3. 4 To 4. However, BTRFS had significantly better performance with small files than EXT4. This correlates with the previous experiment and the hypothesis. 1. Difference is that ext4 backups take space, while backups on btrfs take no space. Linux File System Comparison: XFS vs. 2. Xfs is very opinionated as filesystems go. XFS is Red Hat’s enterprise filesystem (until they finally trust btrfs). At the time, ZFS was significantly slower than xfs and ext4 except when the L2ARC was used. The major difference between ext4 and XFS file systems is that the ext4 file system works better for fewer size files (single write/read thread) while the XFS works more efficiently for larger files (multiple read/write threads). Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. Ability to shrink filesystem. 8ではPhoronixのテストの結果ではXFSが非常に速く、Ext4が遅い。 Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. 4TB HDD formatted as NTFS for backuping all other three hard disks. If you want to see how Bcachefs compares to. Edit: fsdump / fsrestore means the corresponding system backup and restore to for that file system. I'd stick with safer file systems like XFS, JFS, EXT4, or imported ZFSOnLinux. To have best performance use noatime mount option, and I also recommend to use mount option. ) TL, DR: All 3 major next gen CoW file systems have their advantages and drawbacks, and I figure integrating them into my workflow is the only way to fairly evaluate them see how they work for myself. After reading a few articles I decided to use JFS in favour of XFS. So…. Your gaming performance shouldn't be affected by either, since games are mostly just reads anyways. 但无论如何，各个文件系统都需要存储这三类信息，因为这是内核规定的（见下）。. It’s an improved version of the older Ext3 file system that includes a lot of great features, including ones for Solid State Drives (SSDS). The chart below displays the difference in terms of hard drive space reserved for redundancy. 6. EXT4 es el sistema de archivos más utilizado en sistemas operativos basados en Linux, este sistema de archivos es transaccional y tiene características muy importantes como que no requiere un procesador muy potente, y tenemos una muy. oneiric: 996. my rough draft would be to offer an advanced option for the mount points (i. ext4 vs NTFS. Btrfs stands for B Tree Filesystem, It is often pronounced as “better-FS” or “butter-FS. However, to be honest, it’s not the best Linux file system comparing to other Linux file systems. XFS is better larger files and long-term maintaince and stability. Quota journaling: This avoids the need for lengthy quota consistency checks after a crash. EXT4 vs. A) crater. Learn how to compare btrfs with other file systems like ZFS, ext4, or XFS in terms of features, benefits, and drawbacks. EXT4 vs. Phoronix: Linux 5. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. Performance: Ext4 performs better in everyday tasks and is faster for small file writes. Comparison of archive formats. Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. But it's slow when used with fsync -intensive programs such as dpkg (I know eatmydata and the crappy apt-btrfs-snapshot programs) and I won't setup a. OMV4 or OMV5. ZFS does have advantages for handling data corruption (due to data checksums and scrubbing) - but unless you're spreading the data between multiple disks, it will at most tell you "well, that file's corrupted, consider it gone now". I think ext4 is _much_ faster at fsck. Support for large file sizes - The Ext4 supports a single file size of up to 16 TiB ( Tebibytes ) whereas XFS supports a max file size of up to 8 exbibytes. What concerns me is reports that its heavier on ssd's due to all the extra metadata tracking etc. Both are suitable for everyday use, but it's worth noting that. Backups and CoW, are why I use btrfs. 특히 시놀로지에서는 데이터 보호와 백업의 용이함을 장점으로 내세운 Btrfs를 권장합니다. I've heard good things about BTRFS, and I'd use XFS but I dislike that it takes an significant % of the free-space off the bat. XFS was more fragile, but the issue seems to be fixed. I've never had an issue with either, and currently run btrfs + luks. BTRFS and ZFS are metadata vs. X percent… The more modern filesystems of BTRFS and ZFS not only have data integrity features but also the inline compression pushes the efficiency past 100%. In some areas Btrfs was showing great improvements in performance, especially for the RAID setup, but it still lacked in some other areas. Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: FreeBSD ZFS vs. Main features include: Support Larger filesystem - XfS support file system size upto 1PiB whereas Ext4 support up to 50TiB. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. A. ZFS, the Zettabyte file system, was developed as part of the Solaris operating system created by Sun Microsystems. Out of curiosity I have tried BTRFS (still unstable so I can't really expect to be able to use it) and noticed that the read speed is about 150% of ext4 - while write speed. (2013) compared the performance of Btrfs against XFS and ext4. But shrinking is no problem for ext4 or btrfs. But I was more talking to the XFS vs EXT4 comparison. Stratis is no where near ready for version 1. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. Last updated on Aug 4, 2023 All File Systems How do you compare btrfs with other file systems like ZFS, ext4, or XFS? Powered by AI and the LinkedIn community File systems are an essential. For a future article will be a look at non-mainlined file-systems, including ZFS On Linux. No ext4, você pode ativar cotas ao criar o sistema de arquivo ou mais tarde em um sistema de arquivo existente. Phoronix: Linux 4. #11. Comparison of file archivers. They both use delayed allocation to achieve file fragmentation while both do not support mounted snapshots. Difference between Ext4 vs Btrfs filesystems on Linux. EXT4 has been the Linux default since 2006, following the previous EXT3. AdamV158. The only realistic benchmark is the one done on a real application in real conditions. Ext4 is probably the final evolution of the ext filesystem (which started with ext, then ext2, ext3, and now ext4). all kinds for nice features (like extents, subsecond timestamps) which ext3 does not have. ext4 is certainly is much more stable than btrfs. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. I currently have a ds1819+, currently, i have 8 x 4tb (5400rpm) 32G of ram 2x2tb nvme cachethe system is super fragmented and super slow synology says that i need to backup everything and recreate the volume. Through many years of development, it is one of the most stable file systems. Small_Light_9964 • 1 yr. It you have huge hard drives, BTRFS supports up to 16 times larger size than 1 EXT4 partition. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99.